Back

Patient-Centered Approach Might Effectively Tackle The Definition Of Progression In Chronic Neurological Diseases: Results From the EmBioProMS Trial in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Abdelhak, A.; Krumbholz, M.; Senel, M.; Havla, J.; Zettl, U. K.; Kleiter, I.; Skripuletz, T.; Stahmann, A.; Huss, A.; Antweiler, K. L.; Gingele, S.; Kowarik, M. C.; Hoshi, M.-M.; Hengstebeck, S.; Friede, T.; Ludolph, A. C.; Kuempfel, T.; Ziemann, U.; Tumani, H.

2021-09-12 neurology
10.1101/2021.09.07.21262777 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProper identification of disability accumulation in the routine clinical care of progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) patients is usually a challenging task. Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) can provide a practical, cost-efficient, and remotely accessible tool to assess disease progression. MethodsEmBioProMS is a prospective, multicentric cohort, conducted in 7 specialized MS centers in Germany. PROMs were evaluated at inclusion and compared between patients with retrospective evidence of disease progression in the last two years and those with stable disease. Patients with either primary or secondary progressive MS according to the McDonald criteria 2017 were included in the analysis, while patients with incomplete PROMs scores, MS relapses, other neurological or systemic inflammatory diseases were excluded. The disease progression was assessed using a combined outcome parameter, including EDSS score, timed 25-foot walk test, and nine-hole-peg test. Results185 patients were included in the final analysis (SPMS, n=77; PPMS, n=108). The median age and disease duration were 55 years and 13 years, respectively. Disease progression was diagnosed in 114 of 185 patients (61.6%). BDI-II, MSIS-29, and FSMC scores were worse in patients with evidence of disease progression in the last two years. Patients with any of the included PROMs above the 90th percentile had an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.4-10.6, P=0.01) for having progression in the last two years in a binomial regression model adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, treatment status, center effect, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Similar results were observed in patients with PROM scores in the 80th and 70th percentile (OR: 2.9 and 3.7, P=0.015 and 0.003, respectively). ConclusionPROMs can be a simple and effective way to detect disability worsening in a chronic neurological disease like PMS and, therefore, substantially contribute to better classification and prognostication of the disease course through objective and structural patient-doctor communication. Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien - DRKS), DRKS00020132

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
7
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
18
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%