Linear superposition of responses evoked by individual glottal pulses explain over 80% of the frequency following response to human speech in the macaque monkey
Teichert, T.; Gnanateja, G. N.; Sadagopan, S.; Chandresekaran, B.
Show abstract
The frequency-following response (FFR) is a scalp-recorded electrophysiological potential that closely follows the periodicity of complex sounds such as speech. It has been suggested that FFRs reflect the linear superposition of responses that are triggered by the glottal pulse in each cycle of the fundamental frequency (F0 responses) and sequentially propagate through auditory processing stages in brainstem, midbrain, and cortex. However, this conceptualization of the FFR is debated, and it remains unclear if and how well a simple linear superposition can capture the spectro-temporal complexity of FFRs that are generated within the highly recurrent and non-linear auditory system. To address this question, we used a deconvolution approach to compute the hypothetical F0 responses that best explain the FFRs in rhesus monkeys to human speech and click trains with time-varying pitch patterns. The linear superposition of F0 responses explained well over 90% of the variance of click train steady state FFRs and well over 80% of mandarin tone steady state FFRs. The F0 responses could be measured with high signal-to-noise ratio and featured several spectro-temporally and topographically distinct components that likely reflect the activation of brainstem (<5ms; 200-1000 Hz), midbrain (5-15 ms; 100-250 Hz) and cortex (15-35 ms; ~90 Hz). In summary, our results in the monkey support the notion that FFRs arise as the superposition of F0 responses by showing for the first time that they can capture the bulk of the variance and spectro-temporal complexity of FFRs to human speech with time-varying pitch. These findings identify F0 responses as a potential diagnostic tool that may be useful to reliably link altered FFRs in speech and language disorders to altered F0 responses and thus to specific latencies, frequency bands and ultimately processing stages.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras 97%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 96%
- Direct cochlear recordings in humans show a theta rhythmic modulation of the auditory nerve by selective attention 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions 97%
- Click evoked Middle Ear Muscle Reflex: Spectral and Temporal Aspects 96%
- Speech categorization is better described by induced rather than evoked neural activity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Amplitude modulation encoding in auditory cortex: Comparisons between the primary and middle lateral belt regions 95%
- Neuronal responses in mouse inferior colliculus correlate with behavioral detection of amplitude modulated sound 95%
- Mutual Information Analysis of Neural Representations of Speech in Noise in the Aging Midbrain 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chirp Sensitivity and Vowel Coding in the Inferior Colliculus 96%
- Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on formant-frequency discrimination: Measurements and models 96%
- Enhancing the sensitivity of the envelope-following response for cochlear synaptopathy screening in humans: the role of stimulus envelope 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decoding of selective attention to continuous speech from the human auditory brainstem response 97%
- Attention Decoding at the Cocktail Party: Preserved in Hearing Aid Users, Reduced in Cochlear Implant Users 96%
- The integration of continuous audio and visual speech in a cocktail-party environment depends on attention 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.