Back

Insights from complex trait fine-mapping across diverse populations

Kanai, M.; Ulirsch, J. C.; Karjalainen, J.; Kurki, M.; Karczewski, K. J.; Fauman, E.; Wang, Q. S.; Jacobs, H.; Aguet, F.; Ardlie, K. G.; Kerimov, N.; Alasoo, K.; Benner, C.; Ishigaki, K.; Sakaue, S.; Reilly, S.; The BioBank Japan Project, ; FinnGen, ; Kamatani, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Palotie, A.; Neale, B. M.; Tewhey, R.; Sabeti, P. C.; Okada, Y.; Daly, M. J.; Finucane, H. K.

2021-09-05 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2021.09.03.21262975 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the great success of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in identifying genetic loci significantly associated with diseases, the vast majority of causal variants underlying disease-associated loci have not been identified1-3. To create an atlas of causal variants, we performed and integrated fine-mapping across 148 complex traits in three large-scale biobanks (BioBank Japan4,5, FinnGen6, and UK Biobank7,8; total n = 811,261), resulting in 4,518 variant-trait pairs with high posterior probability (> 0.9) of causality. Of these, we found 285 high-confidence variant-trait pairs replicated across multiple populations, and we characterized multiple contributors to the surprising lack of overlap among fine-mapping results from different biobanks. By studying the bottlenecked Finnish and Japanese populations, we identified 21 and 26 putative causal coding variants with extreme allele frequency enrichment (> 10-fold) in these two populations, respectively. Aggregating data across populations enabled identification of 1,492 unique fine-mapped coding variants and 176 genes in which multiple independent coding variants influence the same trait (i.e., with an allelic series of coding variants). Our results demonstrate that fine-mapping in diverse populations enables novel insights into the biology of complex traits by pinpointing high-confidence causal variants for further characterization.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.