Multiplexed triage of candidate biomarkers in plasma using internal standard triggered-parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry
Kennedy, J. J.; Whiteaker, J. R.; Ivey, R. G.; Burian, A.; Chowdhury, S.; Tsai, C.-F.; Liu, T.; Lin, C.; Murillo, O.; Lundeen, R. A.; Jones, L. A.; Gafken, P. R.; Longton, G.; Rodland, K. D.; Skates, S.; Landua, J.; Wang, P.; Lewis, M. T.; Paulovich, A. G.
Show abstract
Despite advances in proteomic technologies, clinical translation of plasma biomarkers remains low, partly due to a major bottleneck between the discovery of candidate biomarkers and downstream costly clinical validation studies. Due to a dearth of multiplexable assays, generally only a few candidate biomarkers are tested, and the validation success rate is accordingly low. Here, we demonstrate the capability of internal standard triggered-parallel reaction monitoring (IS-PRM) to prioritize candidate biomarkers for validation studies. A 5,176-plex assay coupling immunodepletion and fractionation with IS-PRM was developed and implemented in human plasma to quantify peptides representing 1,314 breast cancer biomarker candidates. Compared to prior approaches using data-dependent analysis, IS-PRM showed improved sensitivity (912 vs 295 proteins quantified) and precision (CV 0.1 vs 0.27) enabling rank-ordering of candidate biomarkers for validation studies. The assay greatly expands capabilities for quantification of large numbers of proteins and is well suited for prioritization of viable candidate biomarkers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an Adaptive, Economical, and Easy-to-Use SP3-TMT Automated Sample Preparation Workflow for Quantitative Proteomics 97%
- Quantitative analysis of non-histone lysine methylation sites and lysine demethylases in breast cancer cell lines 97%
- A Comparison of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Methods for Drug Target Identification by Thermal Proteome Profiling 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.