Transcriptome analysis reveals high tumor heterogeneity with respect to re-activation of stemness and proliferation programs
Baranovsky, A.; Ivanov, T.; Granovskaya, M.; Papatsenko, D.; Pervouchine, D. D.
Show abstract
Significant alterations in signaling pathways and transcriptional regulatory programs together represent major hallmarks of many cancers. These, among all, include the reactivation of stemness, which is registered by the expression of pathways that are active in the embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Here, we assembled gene sets that reflect the stemness and proliferation signatures and used them to analyze a large panel of RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Consortium in order to specifically assess the expression of stemness-related and proliferation-related genes across a collection of different tumor types. We introduced a metric that captures the collective similarity of the expression profile of a tumor to that of ESCs, which showed that stemness and proliferation signatures vary greatly between different tumor types. We also observed a high degree of intertumoral heterogeneity in the expression of stemness- and proliferation-related genes, which was associated with increased hazard ratios in a fraction of tumors and mirrored by high intratumoral heterogeneity across cancer cells in single cell RNA-seq datasets. Taken together, these results indicate that the expression of stemness signatures is highly heterogeneous and cannot be used as a universal determinant of cancer. This calls into question the universal validity of diagnostic tests that are based on stem cell markers. Author summaryCancer is a deadly human disease which is characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal cells. Stemness, or the expression of stem cell markers, has been identified as a key feature for cancer progression and in many cases correlates with patient survival. In this work, we reanalyzed a large cohort of cancers from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) collection and single-cell cancer data, and found that the degree of stemness reactivation varies greatly between different tumor types, between different tumors of the same type, and also different cells within a tumor. The observed stemness heterogeneity implies that the expression of stemness markers cannot be used as a universal determinant of cancer and calls into question the validity of stemness-based tests that are frequently used for cancer diagnostics.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell DNA and RNA sequencing reveals the dynamics of intra-tumor heterogeneity in a colorectal cancer model 95%
- Systematic single-cell analysis reveals dynamic control of transposable element activity orchestrating the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition 94%
- Differentiation is accompanied by a progressive loss in transcriptional memory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell Transcriptome Profiling of Post-treatment and Treatment-naive Colorectal Cancer: Insights into Putative Mechanisms of Chemoresistance 94%
- Neutrophils exposed to a cholesterol metabolite secrete extracellular vesicles that promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness in breast cancer cells. 92%
- ΔNp63-restricted viral mimicry response impedes cancer cell viability and remodels tumor microenvironment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- FTO-mediated cytoplasmic m6Am demethylation adjusts stem-like properties in colorectal cancer cell 94%
- Single cell transcriptomic profiling identifies tumor-acquired and therapy-resistant cell states in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma 94%
- Amnion signals are essential for mesoderm formation in primates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale pan-cancer analysis reveals broad prognostic association between TGF-β ligands, not Hedgehog, and GLI1/2 expression in tumors 93%
- GRP78 promotes stemness in normal and neoplastic cells 93%
- Both cell autonomous and non-autonomous processes modulate the association between replication timing and mutation rate 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.