Back

The art of snacking: Innovative food extraction in a synanthropic species is associated with food exposure and food categorization

Dhananjaya, T.; Das, S.; Vyas, A. K.; Gahlot, P.; Singh, M.

2021-09-03 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2021.09.01.458608 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extractive foraging is generally studied from the perspective of behavioral flexibility, cognitive ability, innovation and social learning. Despite its potential to elucidate synanthropic adaptation in species exploiting enclosed anthropogenic food, research on extractive foraging under urban conditions is limited. Since a large extent of anthropogenic food is packaged and contains highly processed food, processes of identification/extraction of food by nonhuman species become intriguing themes of research. We studied how processing status of embedded food determined extraction decisions across groups of a species differing in exposure and familiarity to the food. Further, we tested the generalizability of extraction methods. Experimenting with wild bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata), we found exposure- and form (native/shelled/peeled)-specific familiarity to peanuts, state (raw/boiled/roasted)-specific distinction in depeeling, and exposure- and state-specific differences in methods of depeeling. Group with the highest exposure to peanut differed in its propensity to use sophisticated extraction methods, e.g. depeeling by rubbing between palms (bimanual asymmetric action) and rubbing against horizontal substrata (unimanual action). The innovative methods were also extended to roasted peas and chickpeas by the urban group. Our study establishes a causal relationship between familiarity and processing status of food and shows the generalized extension of extraction methods based on food categorization. Summary StatementNonhuman species in cities face upheaval challenges of accessing enclosed and highly processed anthropogenic food. We studied the effects of minor processing of enclosed food on its extraction decisions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
11
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
16
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%