Back

Analysis and extension of exact mean-field theory with dynamic synaptic currents

Ruffini, G.

2021-09-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.09.01.458563 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neural mass models such as the Jansen-Rit or Wendling systems provide a practical framework for representing and interpreting electro-physiological activity (1-6) in both local and global brain models (7, 8). However, they are only partly derived from first principles. While the post-synaptic potential dynamics are inferred from data and can be grounded on diffusion physics (9-11), Freemans "wave to pulse" (W2P) sigmoid function (12-14), used to transduce mean population membrane potential into firing rate, rests on a weaker theoretical standing. On the other hand, Montbrio et al (15, 16) derive an exact mean-field theory (MPR) from a quadratic integrate and fire neuron model under some simplifying assumptions, thereby connecting microscale neural mechanisms and meso/macroscopic phenomena. The MPR model can be seen to replace Freemans W2P sigmoid function with a pair of differential equations for the mean membrane potential and firing rate variables--a dynamical relation between firing rate and membrane potential--, providing a more fundamental interpretation of the semi-empirical NMM sigmoid parameters. In doing so, we show it sheds light on the mechanisms behind enhanced network response to weak but uniform perturbations. In the exact mean-field theory, intrinsic population connectivity modulates the steady-state firing rate W2P relation in a monotonic manner, with increasing self-connectivity leading to higher firing rates. This provides a plausible mechanism for the enhanced response of densely connected networks to weak, uniform inputs such as the electric fields produced by non-invasive brain stimulation. This new, dynamic W2P relation also endows the neural mass model with a form of "inertia", an intrinsic delay to external inputs that depends on, e.g., self-coupling strength and state of the system. Next, we complete the MPR model by adding the second-order equations for delayed post-synaptic currents and the coupling term with an external electric field, bringing together the MPR and the usual NMM formalisms into a unified exact mean-field theory (NMM2) displaying rich dynamical features. In the single population model, we show that the resonant sensitivity to weak alternating electric field is enhanced by increased self-connectivity and slow synapses. O_TEXTBOXSignificance Several decades of research suggest that weak electric fields influence neural processing. A long-standing question in the field is how networks of neurons process spatially uniform weak inputs that barely affect a single neuron but that produce measurable effects in networks. Answering this can help implement electric field coupling mechanisms in neural mass models of the whole brain, and better represent the impact of electrical stimulation or ephaptic communication. This issue can be studied using local detailed computational models, but the use of statistical mechanics methods can deliver "mean-field models" to simplify the analysis. Following the steps of Montbrio et al (15, 16), we show that the sensitivity to inputs such a weak alternating electric field can be modulated by the intrinsic self-connectivity of a neural population, and produce a more grounded set of equations for neural mass modeling to guide further work. C_TEXTBOX

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
17
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
20
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%