The information signature of diverging lineages
Moore, D. G.; Morales, M.; Walker, S. I.; Dolby, G. A.
Show abstract
Divergence and speciation are the generators of biodiversity on Earth. Yet, we still seek to understand why species are unevenly distributed across taxa and geographic settings. This is partly because we lack a way to directly compare aspects of population divergence across unrelated species and an integrative quantitative framework for how geographical setting relates to genetic divergence. Here we postulate that, based on communications theory, there is a communications channel between Earths surface and the structuring of genomic information among populations. Each species is a separate receiver of this message. Organism traits determine the clarity of that channel. Calculating the partial information decomposition (PID) of genetic metrics under different evolutionary scenarios can measure the signature of this communication. We show in silico how the informational decomposition of 97,200 genetic lattices varies as lineages diverge. The decomposed nodes of Tajimas D, {theta}W, and {pi} show strong context-dependent information signatures, while FST was least informative. Specific decompositions detected whether lineages divergence with or without gene flow better than current SFS-based tools. The study of information in an evolutionary genomic and landscape context suggests it may be a helpful framework and for understanding the diversity of life across Earth and their coevolution.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species 95%
- Insights from a general, full-likelihood Bayesian approach to inferring shared evolutionary events from genomic data: Inferring shared demographic events is challenging 95%
- Quantifying the fraction of new mutations that are recessive lethal 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.