Back

Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection During a Delta Variant Epidemic Surge in Multnomah County, Oregon, July 2021

Barlow, R. S.; Larson, L.; Jian, K.

2021-09-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.30.21262446 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been shown to be highly effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection within controlled trials and real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies. Recent reports have estimated reduced VE with the emergence and dissemination of the B.1.617.2 variant ("Delta variant"). We assess VE in Multnomah County, Oregon during a delta variant related epidemic expansion. MethodsA test-negative design (TND) matched case-control analysis was performed to estimate the effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection during July 2021. Cases included a random sample of individuals that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were reported by electronic laboratory report, were >15 years of age, and had no prior known SARS-CoV-2 infections. Controls were age and postal code matched individuals that tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 during July 2021. Immunization status was assessed using the Oregon ALERT Immunization Information system. Results500 case-control pairs were matched (n=1000). 40.4% of cases were up-to-date on COVID-19 immunizations compared to 64.6% of controls. Effectiveness of any completed COVID-19 immunization was 73% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 49-86%), 74% (95% CI 65-85%) for mRNA immunizations (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273), and 72% (95% CI 47-85%) for individuals partially immunized with mRNA immunizations. ConclusionsOur findings estimate high, yet reduced, VE during Delta variant dissemination. These results highlight the importance of COVID-19 immunizations for reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection while juxtaposing the need for additional non-pharmaceutical interventions. Importantly, the reduced VE identified here may predict future reductions in vaccine performance in the context of ongoing viral genetic drift.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.