Back

Forecasting Preventive Dental Quality Measures

Nagarajan, R.; Panny, A.; Ryan, M.; Murphy, S.; Vujicic, M.; Nycz, G.

2021-08-30 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2021.08.29.21262443 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dental quality measures objectively measure the efficiency and performance of dental providers and organizations. While these measures in conjunction with established benchmarks are used routinely for self-assessment, forecasting them ahead of time in a data-driven and evidence-based manner has the potential to assist in assessing future dental treatment needs, oral disease burden, care utilization patterns, and strategic decision making for sustained performance improvement complementing traditional descriptive visualization dashboards. The present study modeled the temporal trends of four key preventive dental quality measures related to caries prevention (Adult New Caries, Sealants (6-9yrs.), Sealants (12-15yrs.), Fluoride Varnish) sampled monthly from (Dec. 2010 to July 2017) averaged across ten Family Health Center Dental Centers (FQHC), Wisconsin, using auto-regressive integrated moving average time series models. Five-month ahead forecasts along with their 95% confidence levels and mean absolute percentage error were determined across the four measures (Adult New Caries: 1.8%, Sealants (6-9yrs.): 0.90%, Sealants (12-15yrs.): 0.30%, Fluoride Varnish: 0.15%). Model diagnostics revealed auto-regressive integrated moving average models to sufficiently capture the temporal patterns of these measures and the forecast estimates of Adult New Caries and Sealants (12-15yrs.) revealed the need for increased efforts for improved preventive care utilization. Forecasting preventive dental quality measures can provide insights into expected treatment needs ahead of time and can assist in optimal resource and staff allocation with potential to prescribe suitable interventions to shift the trajectory from predicted outcomes to desired outcomes in a targeted manner. While the present study investigated organization level preventive dental quality measures, the time series approach presented is as such generic and expected to translate across similar settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.4%
3
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
17
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%