Context-Dependent Flux Coupling via Conserved Small-Molecule Regulatory Structures
Euler, C.; Mahadevan, R.
Show abstract
Small-molecule regulation modulates enzyme activity and is widespread in metabolic networks. However, the organization of small-molecule regulatory networks and its generalized role is not well understood. We analyze the structure of the genome-wide Escherichia coli small-molecule regulatory network (SMRN) to reveal that it optimizes controllability in the metabolic network. This is achieved by conserved, highly overabundant incoherent feedforward loops. Using multi-omics data, we characterize loop examples in central carbon metabolism. These use signals from hypothesized flux-sensing metabolites phosphoenolpyruvate, -ketoglutarate, citrate, and malate to distinguish between glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and glyoxylate shunt activity to differentially couple fluxes across these major modes of metabolism. Our results suggest that coupling of fluxes by direct modulation of enzyme activity is an emergent property of the SMRN that depends heavily on both regulatory structure and metabolic context via the metabolome, and further that flux sensing and coupling may be a global property of the metabolic network.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional Decomposition of Metabolism allows a system-level quantification of fluxes and protein allocation towards specific metabolic functions 96%
- Thermodynamic dissipation constrains metabolic versatility of unicellular growth 94%
- Ecological network analysis reveals cancer-dependent chaperone-client interaction structure and robustness in the mitochondria 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher-Order Interactions in Auxotroph Communities Enhance Their Resilience to Resource Fluctuations 94%
- Gene networks with transcriptional bursting recapitulate rare transient coordinated expression states in cancer 93%
- The design principles of biochemical timers: circuits that discriminate between transient and sustained stimulation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.