Genetic and demographic predictors of general reading ability in two cohorts
Lancaster, H. S.; Dinu, V.; Li, J.; Gruen, J. R.; GRaD Consortium,
Show abstract
PurposeReading ability is a complex skill utilizing multiple proficiencies and that develops through interactions between genetic and environmental factors. This study presents an alternative analytic pipeline to identify key genetic and demographic contributors to reading ability. MethodsWe analyzed data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; N = 3 232) using a multi-step analytical pipeline. To reduce measurement error, we generated a latent reading ability score. We selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on existing literature and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We applied elastic net regression to identify informative predictors in two models, a SNP-only model and a SNP-plus demographic, environmental, and behavioral variables model. We compared the SNP-based heritability estimates and R2 from the fitted models. We also performed pathway enrichment analysis on the informative SNPs. ResultsThe traditional GWAS identified one genome-wide significant SNP on chromosome X and produced a moderate heritability estimate of .23 (SE = 0.07). We included 148 SNPs in the elastic net models. The SNP-only model identified 61 informative SNPs (R2 = .12), whereas the SNP-plus model identified 96 informative SNPs (R2 = .32). The SNP-plus model also showed that several behavioral characteristics positively predicted latent reading ability. Enrichment analysis revealed overrepresentation of several biological pathways among the informative SNPs. ConclusionsThis study shows that our analytic pipeline can identify important genetic and demographic predictors of reading ability, providing a powerful alternative to traditional methods and contributing to a deeper understanding of the factors that drive reading development.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges in screening for de novo noncoding variants contributing to genetically complex phenotypes 92%
- Gene Specific Pathogenicity Predictor for Chromatin-Remodeling BAF Complex-Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorders 91%
- Long-read genome sequencing for the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vestibular contribution to path integration deficits in ‘at-genetic-risk’ for Alzheimer’s disease 91%
- Estimating the heritability of psychological measures in the Human Connectome Project dataset 91%
- Video-Audio Neural Network Ensemble For Comprehensive Screening Of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA Methylation as a Potential Mediator of the Association Between Prenatal Tobacco and Alcohol Exposure and Child Neurodevelopment in a South African Birth Cohort 93%
- Reliably quantifying the severity of social symptoms in children with autism using ASDSpeech 92%
- A brief report: de novo copy number variants in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coordination difficulties, IQ and psychopathology in children with high-risk Copy Number Variants 92%
- Associations Between Polygenic Scores for Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors of Educational Attainment and Measures of Behavior, Psychopathology, and Neuroimaging in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study 90%
- The Positive End of the Polygenic Score Distribution for ADHD: A Low Risk or a Protective Factor? 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.