SEA: Simple Enrichment Analysis of motifs
Bailey, T. L.; Grant, C. E.
Show abstract
Motif enrichment algorithms can identify known sequence motifs that are present to a statistically significant degree in DNA, RNA and protein sequences. Databases of such known motifs exist for DNA- and RNA-binding proteins, as well as for many functional protein motifs. The SEA ("Simple Enrichment Analysis") algorithm presented here uses a simple, consistent approach for detecting the enrichment of motifs in DNA, RNA or protein sequences, as well as in sequences using user-defined alphabets. SEA can identify known motifs that are enriched in a single set of input sequences, and can also perform differential motif enrichment analysis when presented with an additional set of control sequences. Using in vivo DNA (ChIP-seq) data as input to SEA, and validating motifs with reference motifs derived from in vitro data, we show that SEA is is faster than three widely-used motif enrichment algorithms (AME, CentriMo and Pscan), while delivering comparable accuracy. We also show that, in contrast to other motif enrichment algorithms, SEA reports accurate estimates of statistical significance. SEA is easy to use via its web server at https://meme-suite.org, and is fully integrated with the widely-used MEME Suite of sequence analysis tools, which can be freely downloaded at the same web site for non-commercial use.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying promoter sequence architectures via a chunking-based algorithm using non-negative matrix factorisation 95%
- Reconstruction Set Test (RESET): a computationally efficient method for single sample gene set testing based on randomized reduced rank reconstruction error 95%
- GRAFIMO: variant and haplotype aware motif scanning on pangenome graphs 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.