Back

Evaluation of the relationship between quantitative PCR results and cell culturing of SARS2-CoV with respect to symptoms onset and Viral load - a systematic review

rozenberg, g.; Erster, O.; Ghersin, I.; Mandelboim, M.; neuberger, A.; Schwartz, E.

2021-08-25 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.23.21262162 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundViral culture is currently the most accurate method to demonstrate viability and infectivity of Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-2 CoV). Routine clinical diagnosis, however, is mostly performed by PCR - based assays that do not discriminate between infectious and non-virus. Herein, we aimed to determine the correlation between positive viral cultures and either PCR positivity, the Cycle Threshold (Ct) or the number of viral copies. MethodsA systematic electronic literature search was performed and studies that reported both viral SARS-CoV-2 culture and PCR-based assays were included. A separate search for samples from blood, urine, stool, breast milk and tears were performed. To convert Ct values reported in the reviewed studies were to viral genomic copies, calibration experiments with four different reaction performed, using quantified RNA molecules. ResultsA total 540 articles were reviewed, and 38 studies were included in this review. Out of 276 positive-culture of non-severe patients, 272 (98.55%) were negative ten days after symptoms onset, while PCR assays remained positive for up to 67 days. In severely ill or immunocompromised patients positive-culture was obtained up to 32 days and out of 168 cultures, 31 (18.45%) stayed positive after day 10. In non-severe patients, in Ct value greater than 30 only 10.8% were still culture-positive while in Ct >35 it was nearly universally negative. The minimal calculated number of viral genome copies in culture-positive sample was 2.5 x 103 copies / mL. These findings were similar in immunocompromised patients. Recovering positive culture from non-respiratory samples was sporadically obtained in stool or urine samples. Conversion of Ct values to viral genome copies showed variability between different PCR assays and highlighted the need to standardize reports to correctly compare results obtained in different laboratories. ConclusionDuring the pandemic phase, non-severe COVID-19 patients who are recovering and are not immuno-suppressed, can be regarded as non-infectious, within 10 days from symptom onset, or with Ct value greater than 35 (or a calculated viral load lower than 1.2x103 copies / mL). These findings have important implications for recovering patients and asymptomatic patients, with respect to isolation criteria. The conversion of Cq values to viral genome copies described herein may be useful in future work, enabling a more standardized comparison between results reported in different studies from different laboratories.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%