Why be thrifty? Sex-specific heterothermic patterns in wintering captive Microcebus murinus do not translate into differences in energy balance.

The physiological mechanisms of the responses toward stressors are the core of ecophysiology studies to understand the limits of an organisms flexibility and better predict the impact of environmental degradation on natural populations. However, little information is available when we question inter-individual variability of these physiological responses, even though they can be particularly important. Some observations of intersexual differences in heterothermy raised the question of a difference in energy management between sexes. Here we assess male and female differences in a mouse lemur model (Microcebus murinus), a highly seasonal Malagasy primate, studying their physiological flexibility toward caloric restriction, and examining the impact on their reproductive success. These animals are adapted for naturally changing food availability and climate conditions, and can express deep torpor, allowing them to spare their energy expenses over the dry and cold season. We monitored body mass and body temperature on 12 males and 12 females over winter, applying a chronic 40% caloric restriction to 6 individuals of each group. Our results showed variability of Tb modulations throughout winter and in response to caloric treatment depending on the sex, as females entered deep torpor regardless of food restriction, while only CR males had a similar response. The use of deep torpor, however, did not translate into better body condition either in females, or in response to CR, and did not clearly affect reproductive success. The favorable captive context potentially buffered the depth of torpor and minimized the positive effects of using torpor on energy savings. However, our results may emphasize the existence of other benefits of heterothermic responses than fat reserves.