Back

A Network Approach to Identify Biomarkers of Differential Chemotherapy Response Using Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Petrosyan, V.; Dobrolecki, L. E.; Thistlethwaite, L.; Lewis, A. N.; Sallas, C.; Rajaram, R.; Lei, J. T.; Ellis, M. J.; Osborne, K.; Rimawi, M.; Pavlick, A.; Shafaee, M.; Dowst, H.; Saltzman, A. B.; Malovannaya, A.; Marangoni, E.; Welm, A.; Welm, B. E.; Li, S.; Wulf, G.; Sonzogni, O.; Hilsenbeck, S. G.; Milosavljevic, A.; Lewis, M. T.

2021-08-20 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.08.20.457116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous set of diseases that has, until recently, lacked any FDA-approved, molecularly targeted therapeutics. Thus, systemic chemotherapy regimens remain the standard of care for many. Unfortunately, even combination chemotherapy is ineffective for many TNBC patients, and side-effects can be severe or lethal. Identification of predictive biomarkers for chemotherapy response would allow for the prospective selection of responsive patients, thereby maximizing efficacy and minimizing unwanted toxicities. Here, we leverage a cohort of TNBC PDX models with responses to single-agent docetaxel or carboplatin to identify biomarkers predictive for differential response to these two drugs. To demonstrate their ability to function as a preclinical cohort, PDX were molecularly characterized using whole-exome DNA sequencing, RNAseq transcriptomics, and mass spectrometry-based total proteomics to show proteogenomic consistency with TCGA and CPTAC clinical samples. Focusing first on the transcriptome, we describe a network-based computational approach to identify candidate epithelial and stromal biomarkers of response to carboplatin (MSI1, TMSB15A, ARHGDIB, GGT1, SV2A, SEC14L2, SERPINI1, ADAMTS20, DGKQ) and docetaxel (ITGA7, MAGED4, CERS1, ST8SIA2, KIF24, PARPBP). Biomarker panels are predictive in PDX expression datasets (RNAseq and Affymetrix) for both taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) and platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) response, thereby demonstrating both cross expression platform and cross drug class robustness. Biomarker panels were also predictive in clinical datasets with response to cisplatin or paclitaxel, thus demonstrating translational potential of PDX-based preclinical trials. This network-based approach is highly adaptable and can be used to evaluate biomarkers of response to other agents.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
11
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
15
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
17
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
21
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%