Back

Mutations that adapt SARS-CoV-2 to mustelid hosts do not increase fitness in the human airway.

Zhou, J.; Peacock, T. P.; Brown, J. C.; Goldhill, D. H.; Elrefaey, A. M. E.; Penrice-Randal, R.; Cowton, V. M.; De Lorenzo, G.; Furnon, W.; Harvey, W. T.; Kugathasan, R.; Frise, R.; Baillon, L.; Lassauniere, R.; Thakur, N.; Gallo, G.; Goldswain, H.; Donovan-Banfield, I.; Dong, X.; Randle, N. P.; Sweeney, F.; Glynn, M. C.; Quantrill, J. L.; McKay, P. F.; Patel, A. H.; Palmarini, M.; Hiscox, J. A.; Bailey, D.; Barclay, W. S.

2021-08-20 microbiology Community evaluation
10.1101/2021.08.20.456972 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SARS-CoV-2 has a broad mammalian species tropism infecting humans, cats, dogs and farmed mink. Since the start of the 2019 pandemic several reverse zoonotic outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 have occurred in mink, one of which reinfected humans and caused a cluster of infections in Denmark. Here we investigate the molecular basis of mink and ferret adaptation and demonstrate the spike mutations Y453F, F486L, and N501T all specifically adapt SARS-CoV-2 to use mustelid ACE2. Furthermore, we risk assess these mutations and conclude mink-adapted viruses are unlikely to pose an increased threat to humans, as Y453F attenuates the virus replication in human cells and all 3 mink-adaptations have minimal antigenic impact. Finally, we show that certain SARS-CoV-2 variants emerging from circulation in humans may naturally have a greater propensity to infect mustelid hosts and therefore these species should continue to be surveyed for reverse zoonotic infections.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.