A multidimensional Mendelian randomization study on the impact of gut dysbiosis on chronic diseases and human longevity
Gagnon, E.; Mitchell, P.; Manikpurage, H. D.; Abner, E.; Taba, N.; Esko, T.; Ghodsian, N.; Theriault, S.; Mathieu, P.; Arsenault, B.
Show abstract
Alterations of the gut microbiota, often referred to as gut dysbiosis, have been associated with several chronic diseases and longevity in pre-clinical models as well as in observational studies. Whether these relationships underlie causal associations in humans remains to be established. We aimed to determine whether gut dysbiosis influences the risk of chronic diseases and longevity using a comprehensive 2-Sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) approach. We included as exposures inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as a human model of gut dysbiosis, 11 gut-associated metabolites and pathways and 48 microbial taxa. Study outcomes included eight chronic diseases previously linked with gut dysbiosis using observational studies (Alzheimers disease, depression, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease) as well as parental longevity and life expectancy. Neither IBD, nor gut-associated metabolites were causally associated with chronic disease or lifespan. After multiple testing correction for 582 tests, no microbial taxa-chronic disease associations remained significant. After robustness analyses and multivariate MR to correct for body mass index and alcohol intake on all 42 nominally significant causal relationships, four associations remained. Altogether, results of this multidimensional Mendelian randomization study suggest that gut dysbiosis has little impact on chronic diseases and human longevity and that previous documented associations may not underly causal relationships. Studies with larger sample sizes and more optimal taxonomic discrimination may ultimately be required to determine whether the human gut microbiota plays a causal role in the etiology of chronic diseases and longevity.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key features of the genetic architecture and evolution of host-microbe interactions revealed by high-resolution genetic mapping of the mucosa-associated gut microbiome in hybrid mice 94%
- Microbes with higher metabolic independence are enriched in human gut microbiomes under stress 94%
- An atlas of associations between polygenic risk scores from across the human phenome and circulating metabolic biomarkers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refinement of a published gene-physical activity interaction impacting HDL-cholesterol: role of sex and lipoprotein subfractions 91%
- Genome-wide association studies of 27 accelerometry-derived physical activity measurements identified novel loci and genetic mechanisms 91%
- Integrative genomic analysis in African American children with asthma finds 3 novel loci associated with lung function 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A leaky gut dysregulates gene networks in the brain associated with immune activation, oxidative stress, and myelination in a mouse model of colitis 92%
- Early-Life Gut Inflammation Drives Sex-Dependent Shifts in the Microbiome-Endocrine-Brain Axis 91%
- Association between inflammation and cognition: triangulation of evidence using a population-based cohort and Mendelian randomization analyses 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene-environment interaction analysis incorporating sex, cardiometabolic diseases, and multiple deprivation index reveals novel genetic associations with COVID-19 severity 93%
- Admixture Mapping of Peripheral Artery Disease in a Dominican Population Reveals a Novel Risk Locus on 2q35 92%
- Longitudinal study of DNA methylation and epigenetic clocks prior to and following test-confirmed COVID-19 and mRNA vaccination 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.