Back

Data Matrix Normalization and Merging Strategies Minimize Batch-specific Systemic Variation in scRNA-Seq Data

Babcock, B. R.; Kosters, A.; Yang, J.; White, M. L.; Ghosn, E.

2021-08-19 systems biology
10.1101/2021.08.18.456898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) can reveal accurate and sensitive RNA abundance in a single sample, but robust integration of multiple samples remains challenging. Large-scale scRNA-seq data generated by different workflows or laboratories can contain batch-specific systemic variation. Such variation challenges data integration by confounding sample-specific biology with undesirable batch-specific systemic effects. Therefore, there is a need for guidance in selecting computational and experimental approaches to minimize batch-specific impacts on data interpretation and a need to empirically evaluate the sources of systemic variation in a given dataset. To uncover the contributions of experimental variables to systemic variation, we intentionally perturb four potential sources of batch-effect in five human peripheral blood samples. We investigate sequencing replicate, sequencing depth, sample replicate, and the effects of pooling libraries for concurrent sequencing. To quantify the downstream effects of these variables on data interpretation, we introduced a new scoring metric, the Cell Misclassification Statistic (CMS), which identifies losses to cell type fidelity that occur when merging datasets of different batches. CMS reveals an undesirable overcorrection by popular batch-effect correction and data integration methods. We show that optimizing gene expression matrix normalization and merging can reduce the need for batch-effect correction and minimize the risk of overcorrecting true biological differences between samples.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.3%
4
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.6%
6
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.3%
7
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
10
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
12
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
14
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.6%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%