The Rules of Pulsatile Neurostimulation
Steinhardt, C. R.; Mitchell, D. E.; Cullen, K. E.; Fridman, G. Y.
Show abstract
Electrical stimulation is a key tool in neuroscience, both in brain mapping studies and in many therapeutic applications such as cochlear, vestibular, and retinal neural implants. Due to safety considerations, stimulation is restricted to short biphasic pulses. Despite decades of research and development, neural implants lead to varying restoration of function in patients. In this study, we use computational modeling to provide an explanation for how pulsatile stimulation affects axonal channels and therefore leads to variability in restoration of neural responses. The phenomenological explanation is transformed into equations that predict induced firing rate as a function of pulse rate, pulse amplitude, and spontaneous firing rate. We show that these equations predict simulated responses to pulsatile stimulation with a variety of parameters as well as several features of experimentally recorded vestibular afferent responses to pulsatile stimulation. We then discuss the implications of these effects for improving clinical stimulation paradigms and electrical stimulation-based experiments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational model explains and predicts substantia nigra pars reticulata responses to pallidal and striatal inputs 95%
- Diverse and complex muscle spindle afferent firing properties emerge from multiscale muscle mechanics 95%
- Annihilation of action potentials induces electrical coupling between neurons 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deciphering how interneuron specific 3 cells control oriens lacunosum-moleculare cells to contribute to circuit function 96%
- Neuronal phase shifts differ for excitation vs. inhibition: a computer modeling study 95%
- Small dendritic synapses enhance temporal coding in a model of cochlear nucleus bushy cells 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intensity- and frequency-specific effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation are explained by network dynamics 95%
- Understanding responses to multi-electrode epiretinal stimulation using a biophysical model 95%
- How to entrain a selected neuronal rhythm but not others: open-loop dithered brain stimulation for selective entrainment 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.