Back

SOX2-phosphorylation toggles a bistable differentiation-switch in squamous cell carcinoma

Hoang-Phou, S.; Sastre-Perona, A.; Abbruzzese, M.; Ying, Z.; Siegle, J.; Aranda Orgilles, B.; Rocha, P. P.; Aifantis, I.; Skok, J.; Beronja, S.; Schober, M.

2021-08-18 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.08.18.455699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fate choice between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation is regulated by bistable transcriptional networks, which are balanced in homeostasis and imbalanced in tumors. Yet, how stem cells switch from self-renewal to differentiation remains a conundrum. Here, we discover a molecular mechanism that allows stem cell-like tumor propagating cells (TPCs) in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) to switch from a mutually exclusive SOX2-PITX1-TP63 self-renewal circuit to a KLF4 driven differentiation program, dependent on the relative occupancy of a novel Klf4-regulatory enhancer cluster (Klf4EC944) by SOX2 or KLF4, respectively. We find SOX2 occupies this site in TPCs to inhibit Klf4 transcription, but upon phosphorylation SOX2 becomes evicted from Klf4EC944, allowing residual KLF4 to occupy this site instead, boost the expression of KLF4 and its downstream targets, and differentiate self-renewing TPCs into post-mitotic SCC cells. This mechanism allows SOX2 to promote self-renewal and tumor formation, while preserving the differentiation potential in SCC cells. Our data suggest that stochastic cell fate decisions depend on the effective concentration of enzymatically regulated transcription factors. The surprising specificity by which SOX2-phosphorylation governs the bistable Klf4EC944 network-switch in SCCs reveals a conceptual framework for the identification of similar switches in other stem cell and cancer types and their potential development into cell type specific differentiation therapies for diseases in which tissue homeostasis has gone awry.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.