DARQ: Deep learning of quality control for stereotaxic registration of human brain MRI
Fonov, V.; Dadar, M.; The PREVENT-AD Research Group, ; ADNI, ; Collins, D. L.
Show abstract
Linear registration to stereotaxic space is a common first step in many automated image-processing tools for analysis of human brain MRI scans. This step is crucial for the success of the subsequent image-processing steps. Several well-established algorithms are commonly used in the field of neuroimaging for this task, but none have a 100% success rate. Manual assessment of the registration is commonly used as part of quality control. To reduce the burden of this time-consuming step, we propose Deep Automated Registration Qc (DARQ), a fully automatic quality control method based on deep learning that can replace the human rater and accurately perform quality control assessment for stereotaxic registration of T1w brain scans. In a recently published study from our group comparing linear registration methods, we used a database of 9325 MRI scans and 64476 registrations from several publicly available datasets and applied seven linear registration tools to them. In this study, the resulting images that were assessed and labeled by a human rater are used to train a deep neural network to detect cases when registration failed. We further validated the results on an independent dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis, with manual QC labels available (n=1200). In terms of agreement with a manual rater, our automated QC method was able to achieve 89%accuracy and 85% true negative rate (equivalently 15% false positive rate) in detecting scans that should pass quality control in a balanced cross-validation experiments, and 96.1% accuracy and 95.5% true negative rate (or 4.5% FPR) when evaluated in a balanced independent sample, similar to manual QC rater (test-retest accuracy of 93%). The results show that DARQ is robust, fast, accurate, and generalizable in detecting failure in linear stereotaxic registrations and can substantially reduce QC time (by a factor of 20 or more) when processing large datasets.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Based Segmentation of Brain Tissue from Diffusion MRI 98%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 97%
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- CEREBRUM-7T: Fast and Fully-volumetric Brain Segmentation of 7 Tesla MR Volumes 97%
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 97%
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Harmonized diffusion MRI data and white matter measures from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study 97%
- Collegiate athlete brain data for white matter mapping and network neuroscience 96%
- An open, analysis-ready, and quality controlled resource for pediatric brain white-matter research 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- MISPEL: A supervised deep learning harmonizationmethod for multi-scanner neuroimaging data 98%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 97%
- Triplanar ensemble U-Net model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation on MR images 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.