Use of the Azure Kinect to measure foot clearance during obstacle crossing
Yoshimoto, K.; Shinya, M.
Show abstract
Obstacle crossing is a typical adaptive locomotion known to be related to the risk of falls. Previous conventional studies have used elaborate and costly optical motion capture systems, which not only represent a considerable expense but also require participants to visit a laboratory. To overcome these shortcomings, we aimed to develop a practical and inexpensive solution for measuring obstacle-crossing behavior by using the Microsoft Azure Kinect, one of the most promising markerless motion capture systems. We validated the Azure Kinect as a tool to measure foot clearance and compared its performance to that of an optical motion capture system (Qualisys). We also determined the effect of the Kinect sensor placement on measurement performance. Sixteen healthy young men crossed obstacles of different heights (50, 150, and 250 mm). Kinect sensors were placed in front of and beside the obstacle as well as diagonally between those positions. As indices of measurement quality, we counted the number of measurement failures and calculated the systematic and random errors between the foot clearance measured by the Kinect and Qualisys. We also calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients between the Kinect and Qualisys measurements. The number of measurement failures and the systematic and random error were minimized when the Kinect was placed diagonally in front of the obstacle on the same side as the trail limb. The high correlation coefficient (r > 0.890) observed between the Kinect and Qualisys measurements suggests that the Azure Kinect has excellent potential for measuring foot clearance during obstacle-crossing tasks.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a smartphone embedded inertial measurement unit for measuring postural stability in older adults 96%
- Predicting vertical and shear ground reaction forces during walking and jogging using wearable plantar pressure insoles 96%
- The effects of pressure on anticipatory postural adjustments during a jump shot in basketball 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 96%
- Development and validation of 2D-LiDAR-based gait analysis instrument and algorithm 95%
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units in active range of motion assessment in the hip joint 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inertial sensor-based centripetal acceleration as a correlate for lateral margin of stability during walking and turning 96%
- Modulation of Arm Swing Frequency and Gait Using Rhythmic Tactile Feedback 96%
- Continuous Monitoring of Head Turns: Compliance, Kinematics, and Reliability of Wearable Sensing 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.