Back

Coronavirus Disease 2019 In A Tertiary Pediatric Center In Portugal

Milheiro Silva, T.; Garcia, A. M.; Gouveia, C.; Candeias, F.; Brito, M. J.

2021-08-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.16.21262100 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesDescribe the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of SARS-CoV-2 infected children at a tertiary pediatric center in Portugal during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. DesignSingle center, descriptive study of pediatric patients, who had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 7 to September 20, 2020. SettingTertiary Pediatric referral center. Patients18 years or younger. Main outcome measuresIncidence, mortality, age of infection, clinical characteristics, treatment prescribed and outcome. ResultsA total of 300 patients were included with a median age of 5 years (IQR 1-11) and in 67% a contact was identified (co-habitant in 52.7%). 56 (18.7%) had pre-existing medical conditions. A mode of three days mediated symptom appearance to diagnose. The most common symptoms were fever (55.7%), cough (38.3%), and nasal congestion (24%). 23% of the patients were admitted due to complications related to COVID-19 and 2% required intensive care. We used drugs with antiviral activity in 9% of the patients, immunomodulatory medication with corticosteroids in 3.3%, and intravenous immunoglobulin in 1.7%. Two (0.6%) children died and 2.3% reported short-term sequelae. ConclusionsCOVID-19 is usually a mild disease in children, but a small proportion of patients develop severe and critical disease. Fatal outcomes were rare overall and exclusive of severe previous medical conditions. Suspecting and diagnosing COVID-19 in children based on their symptoms without epidemiologic information and virus testing is very challenging. Our data also reflect the uncertainties regarding specific treatment options, highlighting that additional data on antiviral and immunomodulatory drugs are urgently needed.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.