Back

Neutralization of VOCs including Delta one year post COVID-19 or vaccine

Havervall, S.; Marking, U.; Gordon, M.; Ng, H.; Greilert-Norin, N.; Lindbo, S.; Blom, K.; Nilsson, P.; Phillipson, M.; Klingstrom, J.; Mangsbo, S.; Aberg, M.; Hober, S.; Thalin, C.

2021-08-12 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.12.21261951 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 variants, such as Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta, are raising concern about the efficiency of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) induced by wild-type infection or vaccines based on the wild-type spike. MethodsWe determined IgG and NAb against SARS-CoV-2 variants one year following mild wild-type infection (n=104) and two-dose regimens with BNT162b2 (BNT/BNT) (n=67), ChAdOx1 (ChAd/ChAd) (n=82), or heterologous ChAdOx1 followed by BNT162b2 (ChAd/BNT) (n=116). FindingsWild type spike IgG and NAb remained detectable in 80% (83/104) of unvaccinated participants one year post mild infection. The neutralizing capacity was similar against wild type (reference), Alpha (0.95 (0.92-0.98) and Delta 1.03 (0.95-1.11) but significantly reduced against Beta (0.54 (0.48-0.60)) and Gamma 0.51 (0.44-0.61). Similarly, BNT/BNT and ChAd/ChAd elicited sustained capacity against Alpha and Delta (1.01 (0.78-1.31) and 0.85 (0.64-1.14)) and (0.96 (0.84-1.09) and 0.82 (0.61-1.10) respectively), with reduced capacity against Beta (0.67 (0.50-0.88) and 0.53 (0.40-0.71)) and Gamma (0.12 (0.06-0.27) and 0.54 (0.37-0.80)). A similar trend was found following ChAd/BNT (0.74 (0.66-0.83) and 0.70 (0.50-0.97) against Alpha and Delta and 0.29 (0.20-0.42) and 0.13 (0.08-0.20) against Beta and Gamma). InterpretationPersistent neutralization of the wide-spread Alpha and Delta variants one year after wild-type infection may aid vaccine policy makers in low-resource settings when prioritizing vaccine supply. The reduced capacity of neutralizing Beta and Gamma strains, but not the Alpha and Delta strains following both infection and three different vaccine regimens argues for caution against Beta and Gamma-exclusive mutations in the efforts to optimize next generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. FundingA full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
8
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
9
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%