Neutralization of VOCs including Delta one year post COVID-19 or vaccine
Havervall, S.; Marking, U.; Gordon, M.; Ng, H.; Greilert-Norin, N.; Lindbo, S.; Blom, K.; Nilsson, P.; Phillipson, M.; Klingstrom, J.; Mangsbo, S.; Aberg, M.; Hober, S.; Thalin, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 variants, such as Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta, are raising concern about the efficiency of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) induced by wild-type infection or vaccines based on the wild-type spike. MethodsWe determined IgG and NAb against SARS-CoV-2 variants one year following mild wild-type infection (n=104) and two-dose regimens with BNT162b2 (BNT/BNT) (n=67), ChAdOx1 (ChAd/ChAd) (n=82), or heterologous ChAdOx1 followed by BNT162b2 (ChAd/BNT) (n=116). FindingsWild type spike IgG and NAb remained detectable in 80% (83/104) of unvaccinated participants one year post mild infection. The neutralizing capacity was similar against wild type (reference), Alpha (0.95 (0.92-0.98) and Delta 1.03 (0.95-1.11) but significantly reduced against Beta (0.54 (0.48-0.60)) and Gamma 0.51 (0.44-0.61). Similarly, BNT/BNT and ChAd/ChAd elicited sustained capacity against Alpha and Delta (1.01 (0.78-1.31) and 0.85 (0.64-1.14)) and (0.96 (0.84-1.09) and 0.82 (0.61-1.10) respectively), with reduced capacity against Beta (0.67 (0.50-0.88) and 0.53 (0.40-0.71)) and Gamma (0.12 (0.06-0.27) and 0.54 (0.37-0.80)). A similar trend was found following ChAd/BNT (0.74 (0.66-0.83) and 0.70 (0.50-0.97) against Alpha and Delta and 0.29 (0.20-0.42) and 0.13 (0.08-0.20) against Beta and Gamma). InterpretationPersistent neutralization of the wide-spread Alpha and Delta variants one year after wild-type infection may aid vaccine policy makers in low-resource settings when prioritizing vaccine supply. The reduced capacity of neutralizing Beta and Gamma strains, but not the Alpha and Delta strains following both infection and three different vaccine regimens argues for caution against Beta and Gamma-exclusive mutations in the efforts to optimize next generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. FundingA full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Serial infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination 98%
- Kinetics and persistence of the cellular and humoral immune responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in SARS-CoV-2-naive and - experienced subjects 97%
- Comparative magnitude and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses on a population level in Germany 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Slow waning of antibodies following a third dose of BNT162b2 in adults who had previously received two doses of inactivated vaccine 96%
- Homologous and Variant-Specific Memory B-Cell and Antibody Responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 evolution and patient immunological history shape the breadth and potency of antibody-mediated immunity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant to Neutralization by Vaccine-Elicited and Therapeutic Antibodies 96%
- Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Dynamics of humoral and cellular immune responses after homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of An Egg-Based Inactivated Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial in Vietnam 96%
- Durability for 12 months of antibody response to a booster dose of monovalent BNT162b2 in adults who had initially received 2 doses of inactivated vaccine 96%
- Durability of antibody responses elicited by a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S and substantial increase following late boosting 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.