Back

The transmission of African Animal Trypanosomiasis (nagana) in two districts in the forest zone of Ghana

Tweneboah, A.; Rosenau, J.; Agyapong, A. K.; Addison, T. K.; Mahamat, I. A. M.; Weber, J. S.; Kelm, S.; Badu, K.

2021-08-12 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.08.11.455898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The African Animal Trypanosomiasis (nagana) is caused by several species of trypanosome species which results in significant clinical diseases. This consequently leads to huge economic losses. We carried out a cross-sectional survey to investigate the composition of vectors, parasite diversity and intensities in two districts in the Eastern region of Ghana. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) dependent PCR assays identified tsetse fly species and trypanosome parasites circulating in the area. A total of 229 tsetse flies, 65 pigs and 20 were sampled. Female and male flies 155 (51.8%), 74 (32.3%) respectively were collected with biconical traps. The overall vector density of 4.3 flies/trap/day was observed. Typanosome prevalence of 58.9% (95% CI: 52.5-65.1), 46.2% (95% CI: 34.6-58.1) and 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0-16.1) in tsetse flies, pigs and cattle respectively were detected. Trypanosoma congolense was the predominant species with a prevalence of 80.7% (95% CI: 73.3-86.5) in flies and 60.0% (95% CI: 42.3-75.4). There was evidence of multiple trypanosome infection with T. congolense/T. simiae occurring highest with prevalence of 38.0% (95% CI: 30.7-46.9). The parasite prevalence in pigs across the communities was high with significant differences associated between locations (Chi2 = 28.06, 95% CI: 0.05-0.81, P=0.0009). Blood meal with flies revealed feeding on both domestic Sus scrofa domesticus (pig) and Phacochoerus africanus (warthog). Tsetse flies in this area remain highly infected with trypanosomes and continue to transmit the parasites to livestock and human populations in the communities.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.