Estimating the effects of accelerated partner therapy (APT) on reinfection of index cases with chlamydia: a mathematical modelling study
Althaus, C. L.; Estcourt, C. L.; Low, N.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe expected effects of accelerated partner therapy (APT) on the reinfection of treated index cases by untreated partners with Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) remain unclear. We analyzed data from the LUSTRUM cluster cross-over randomised controlled trial (RCT) using a mathematical model and quantified the effects of offering APT on the probability of successful partner treatment. MethodsWe extended a previously developed mathematical model to compute the probability of chlamydia reinfection of index cases by their untreated partners with chlamydia. We fitted the model to data from the RCT and estimated the probability of successful treatment of the partner of index cases using a Bayesian framework. ResultsWe estimated the median probability of reinfection with chlamydia at 16.3% (50% credible interval, CrI: 12.7-20.0%) without partner treatment and 2.3% (50% CrI: 1.7-3.6%) when partner treatment is 100% successful. The observed rates of reinfection in the RCT were 6.7% (95% confidence interval, CI: 5.6-8.0%) during the control period (standard partner notification (PN)) and 4.8% (95% CI: 3.7-5.9%) during the intervention period where APT was offered in addition to standard PN. These rates correspond to a median probability of successful partner treatment of 63% (50% CrI: 47-76%) during the control period and 78% (50% CrI: 65-87%) during the intervention period. ConclusionsOur study suggests that the observed reduction in reinfection with chlamydia when offering APT is consistent with a higher probability of successful partner treatment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Going beyond regular and casual: development of a classification of sexual partner types to enhance partner notification for sexually transmitted infections, a mixed methods approach 93%
- The rise and fall of the new variant of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden: mathematical modelling study 93%
- Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Belgium: awareness, use, and antimicrobial resistance concerns in a cross-sectional online survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Decision Analytics Model to Optimize Investment in Interventions Targeting the PrEP Cascade of Care 94%
- Correlations Between Community-Level HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Coverage and Individual-Level Sexual Behaviors among US Men Who Have Sex with Men 93%
- Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in Australia: A modelling study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa 91%
- Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: A mixed-methods impact evaluation of ‘MTV Shuga Down South’ 90%
- Estimating the burden of mpox among MSM in South Africa 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of implementing HIV and HIV/syphilis dual testing among key populations in Viet Nam: a modeling analysis 92%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The HIV/STI Epidemic Potential of Dynamic Sexual Networks of Men Who Have Sex With Men in Atlanta and San Francisco 94%
- Assessment of Bias in Estimates of Sexual Network Degree using Prospective Cohort Data 92%
- Assessing Direct and Spillover Effects of Intervention Packages in Network-Randomized Studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.