Back

COVID-19 Projections for K12 Schools in Fall 2021: Significant Transmission without Interventions

Zhang, Y.; Johnson, K.; Yu, Z.; Fujimoto, A.; Hassmiller Lich, K.; Ivy, J.; Keskinocak, P.; Mayorga, M.; Swann, J. L.

2021-09-03 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.08.10.21261726 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMillions of primary school students across the United States are about to return to in-person learning. Amidst circulation of the highly infectious Delta variant, there is danger that without the appropriate safety precautions, substantial amount of school-based spread of COVID-19 may occur. MethodsWe used an extended Susceptible-Infected-Recovered computational model to estimate the number of new infections during 1 semester among a student population under different assumptions about mask usage, routine testing, and levels of incoming protection. Our analysis considers three levels of incoming protection (30%, 40%, or 50%; denoted as "low", "mid", or "high"). Universal mask usage decreases infectivity by 50%, and weekly testing may occur among 50% of the student population; positive tests prompt quarantine until recovery, with compliance contingent on symptom status. ResultsWithout masking and testing, more than 75% of susceptible students become get infected within three months in all settings. With masking, this values decreases to 50% for "low" incoming protection settings ("mid"=35%, "high"=24%). Testing half the masked population ("testing") further drops infections to 22% (16%, 13%). ConclusionWithout interventions in place, the vast majority of susceptible students will become infected through the semester. Universal masking can reduce student infections by 26-78%, and biweekly testing along with masking reduces infections by another 50%. To prevent new infections in the community, limit school absences, and maintain in-person learning, interventions such as masking and testing must be implemented widely, especially among elementary school settings in which children are not yet eligible for the vaccine.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
3
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
12
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
24
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
26
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%