Back

Phased Mutations and Complex Rearrangements in Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines through Linked-Read Whole Genome Sequencing

Pham, M.-T. N.; Gupta, H.; Gupta, A.; Vaghasia, A.; Skaist, A.; Garrison, M. A.; Coulter, J. B.; Haffner, M. C.; Wheelan, S. J.; Isaacs, W.; Nelson, W.; Yegnasubramanian, S.

2021-08-10 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.08.09.455584 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A limited number of cell lines have fueled the majority of preclinical Prostate cancer (PCa) research. Despite tremendous effort in characterizing their molecular profiles, comprehensive whole genome sequencing with allelic phasing of somatic genome alterations has not been undertaken to date. Here, we utilized whole genome Linked-read sequencing to obtain haplotype information from the seven most commonly used PCa cell lines (PC3, LNCaP, DU145, CWR22Rv1, VCaP, LAPC4, MDA-PCa-2b), four castrate resistant (CR) subclones (LNCaP_Abl, LNCaP_C42b, VCaP-CR, LAPC4-CR), and an immortalized prostate epithelial line RWPE-1. Phasing of mutations allowed derivation of "Gene-level Haplotype" to assess whether a gene harbored heterozygous mutations in one or both alleles, providing a comprehensive catalogue of mono or bi-allelically inactivated genes. Phased structural variant analysis allowed identification of complex rearrangement chains consistent with chromothripsis and chromoplexy, with breakpoints occurred across a single allele, providing further evidence that complex SVs occurred in a concerted event, rather than through accumulation of multiple independent rearrangements. Additionally, comparison of parental and CR subclones revealed previously known and novel genomic alterations associated with the CR clones. This study therefore comprehensively characterized phased genomic alterations in the commonly used PCa cell lines and provided a useful resource for future cancer research.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.