Symptoms that predict positive COVID-19 testing and hospitalization: an analysis of 9,000 patients
Jalalizadeh, M.; Leme, P. A. F.; Buosi, K.; Dionato, F. A. V.; Giacomelli, C. F.; Dal Col, L. S. B.; Ferrari, K. L.; Pagliarone, A. C.; Gon, L. M.; Cezar, D. F. O.; Esfahani, A. A.; Reis, L. O.
Show abstract
PurposeTo develop a reliable tool that predicts which patients are most likely to be COVID-19 positive and which ones have an increased risk of hospitalization. MethodsFrom February 2020 to April 2021, trained nurses recorded age, gender, and symptoms in an outpatient COVID-19 testing center. All positive patients were followed up by phone for 14 days or until symptom-free. We calculated the symptoms odds ratio for positive results and hospitalization and proposed a "random forest" machine-learning model to predict positive testing. ResultsA total of 8,998 patients over 16 years old underwent COVID-19 RT-PCR, with 1,914 (21.3%) positives. Fifty patients needed hospitalization (2.6% of positives), and three died (0.15%). Most common symptoms were: cough, headache, sore throat, coryza, fever, myalgia (57%, 51%, 44%, 36%, 35%, 27%, respectively). Cough, fever, and myalgia predicted positive COVID-19 test, while others behaved as protective factors. The best predictors of positivity were fever plus anosmia/ageusia (OR=6.31), and cough plus anosmia/ageusia (OR=5.82), both p<0.0001. Our random forest model had an ROC-AUC of 0.72 (specificity=0.70, sensitivity=0.61, PPV=0.38, NPV=0.86). Having steady fever during the first days of infection and persistent dyspnea increased the risk of hospitalization (OR=6.66, p<0.0001 and OR=3.13, p=0.003, respectively), while anosmia-ageusia (OR=0.36, p=0.009) and coryza (OR=0.31, p=0.014) were protective. ConclusionPresent study and algorithm may help identify patients at higher risk of having SARS-COV-2 (online calculator http://wdchealth.covid-map.com/shiny/calculator/), and also disease severity and hospitalization based on symptoms presence, pattern, and duration, which can help physicians and health care providers.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 95%
- Are commercial antibody assays substantially underestimating SARS-CoV-2 ever infection? An analysis on a population-based sample in a high exposure setting 94%
- Climate influences scrub typhus occurrence in Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India: Analysis of a 15 year dataset 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA-extraction-free diagnostic method to detect SARS-CoV-2: an assessment from two States, India 94%
- Prevalence and determinants of serum antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in the general population of the Gardena Valley 94%
- Prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in people attending the two main Goma markets in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome 93%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 93%
- The association between dysnatraemia during hospitalisation and post COVID-19 mental fatigue 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of Developing Symptomatic Disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 Patients 95%
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 95%
- Evaluation of the disease outcome in Covid-19 infected patients by disease symptoms: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Ilam Province, Iran 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.