A Machine Learning Model Incorporating Laboratory Blood Tests Discriminates Between SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza Infections at Emergency Department Visit
Liu, J.; Westblade, L. F.; Chadburn, A.; Fideli, R.; Craney, A.; Rand, S.; Cushing, M.; zhao, Z.; Meng, J.; Yang, H. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza virus are contagious respiratory pathogens with similar symptoms but require different treatment and management strategies. This study investigated whether laboratory blood tests can discriminate between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infections at emergency department (ED) presentation. Methods723 influenza A/B positive (2018/1/1 to 2020/3/15) and 1,281 SARS-CoV-2 positive (2020/3/11 to 2020/6/30) ED patients were retrospectively analyzed. Laboratory test results completed within 48 hours prior to reporting of virus RT-PCR results, as well as patient demographics were included to train and validate a random forest (RF) model. The dataset was randomly divided into training (2/3) and testing (1/3) sets with the same SARS-CoV-2/influenza ratio. The Shapley Additive Explanations technique was employed to visualize the impact of each laboratory test on the differentiation. ResultsThe RF model incorporating results from 15 laboratory tests and demographic characteristics discriminated SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infections, with an area under the ROC curve value 0.90 in the independent testing set. The overall agreement with the RT-PCR results was 83% (95% CI: 80-86%). The test with the greatest impact on the differentiation was serum total calcium level. Further, the model achieved an AUC of 0.82 in a new dataset including 519 SARS-CoV-2 ED patients (2020/12/1 to 2021/2/28) and the previous 723 influenza positive patients. Serum calcium level remained the most impactful feature on the differentiation. ConclusionWe identified characteristic laboratory test profiles differentiating SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infections, which may be useful for the preparedness of overlapping COVID-19 resurgence and future seasonal influenza.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 94%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 94%
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 94%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support System for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction 94%
- A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying Intensive Care Unit Admissions Colonized with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms 93%
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 95%
- Machine Learning-based Clinical Decision Support for Infection Risk Prediction 94%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: the PLANS (Platelet Lymphocyte Age Neutrophil Sex) model 93%
- COVID-19 Hospitalizations in Five California Hospitals 92%
- Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.