COVID-19 vaccination coverage and hesitancy among groups prioritised in Australia's vaccine rollout
Aitken, Z.; Emerson, E.; Kavanagh, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination is the cornerstone of managing Australias COVID-19 pandemic and the success of the vaccination program depends on high vaccination coverage. This paper examined differences in COVID-19 vaccination coverage and vaccine hesitancy for people with disability, long-term health conditions, and carers - subgroups that were prioritised in the vaccination program. MethodsUsing data from 2,400 Australians who participated in two waves of the Taking the Pulse of the Nation survey in April and May 2021, we described vaccination coverage and hesitancy among people with disability, severe mental health conditions, severe long-term health conditions, frequent need for assistance with everyday activities, and carers, disaggregated by age group and gender. FindingsVaccination coverage was estimated to be 8.2% in the sample overall and was similar for people with disability, those with frequent need for assistance, and carers. It was higher for people with severe long-term health conditions (13.4%) and lower for people with severe mental health conditions (4.3%). Vaccine hesitancy was high overall (35.6%) and was similarly high across the priority groups. InterpretationThis study highlights the lack of a difference in vaccination coverage and vaccine hesitancy for people with disability, long-term health conditions, and carers compared to the general population. Sub-optimal vaccination coverage for people in the priority population groups leaves many people at significant risk of serious disease or death if exposed to COVID-19, particularly in light of the easing of disease-control restrictions across Australia and the emergence of new COVID-19 variants. FundingNational Health and Medical Research Council
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends, patterns and psychological influences on COVID-19 vaccination intention: findings from a large prospective community cohort study in England and Wales (Virus Watch) 96%
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 95%
- Employer Requirements and COVID-19 Vaccination and Attitudes among Healthcare Personnel in the U.S.: Findings from National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module, August – September 2021 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: Correlates in a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal and associated factors in an adult population in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from predictive modelling 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: Results from a population-based survey in Canada 96%
- Transition to Endemic: Acceptance of Additional COVID-19 Vaccine Doses Among Canadian Adults in A National Cross-Sectional Survey 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 97%
- Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada – April 2020 to March 2021 95%
- Sociodemographic inequality in COVID-19 vaccination coverage amongst elderly adults in England: a national linked data study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 95%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.