Back

Petascale neural circuit reconstruction: automated methods

Macrina, T.; Lee, K.; Lu, R.; Turner, N. L.; Wu, J.; Popovych, S.; Silversmith, W. W.; Kemnitz, N.; Bae, J. A.; Castro, M. A.; Dorkenwald, S.; Halageri, A.; Jia, Z.; Jordan, C.; Li, K.; Mitchell, E.; Mondal, S. S.; Mu, S.; Nehoran, B.; Wong, W.; Yu, S.-c.; Bodor, A. L.; Brittain, D.; Buchanan, J.; Bumbarger, D. J.; Cobos, E.; Collman, F.; Elabbady, L.; Fahey, P. G.; Froudarakis, E.; Kapner, D.; Kinn, S.; Mahalingam, G.; Papadopoulos, S.; Patel, S.; Schneider-Mizell, C. M.; Sinz, F. H.; Takeno, M.; Torres, R.; Yin, W.; Pitkow, X.; Reimer, J.; Tolias, A. S.; Reid, R. C.; Macarico da Costa, N.; S

2021-08-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.08.04.455162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

3D electron microscopy (EM) has been successful at mapping invertebrate nervous systems, but the approach has been limited to small chunks of mammalian brains. To scale up to larger volumes, we have built a computational pipeline for processing petascale image datasets acquired by serial section EM, a popular form of 3D EM. The pipeline employs convolutional nets to compute the nonsmooth transformations required to align images of serial sections containing numerous cracks and folds, detect neuronal boundaries, label voxels as axon, dendrite, soma, and other semantic categories, and detect synapses and assign them to presynaptic and postsynaptic segments. The output of neuronal boundary detection is segmented by mean affinity agglomeration with semantic and size constraints. Pipeline operations are implemented by leveraging distributed and cloud computing. Intermediate results of the pipeline are held in cloud storage, and can be effortlessly viewed as images, which aids debugging. We applied the pipeline to create an automated reconstruction of an EM image volume spanning four visual cortical areas of a mouse brain. Code for the pipeline is publicly available, as is the reconstructed volume.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.