Back

Temperate tree seedlings have similar drought vulnerability despite having different hydraulic drought responses in adults

Lee, B. R.; Ibanez, I.

2021-08-04 physiology
10.1101/2021.08.04.455116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is projected result in higher frequencies of drought events across the world and lead to reduced performance in many temperate tree species. However, many studies in this area focus specifically on adult tree drought responses and overlook how trees in other age classes might differ in their vulnerability. Evidence shows that seedling drought response can differ from that of adults and furthermore that demographic performance in the seedling age class will have disproportionately strong effects on the assembly dynamics of future forests, together suggesting that understanding seedling drought responses will be critical to our ability to predict how forests will respond to climate change. In this study, we measured four indices of hydraulic response to drought (leaf water potential, photosynthetic capacity, non-structural carbohydrate concentration, and hydraulic conductivity), as well as interaction effects with shade treatments, for seedlings of two temperate tree species that differ in their adult drought response: isohydric Acer saccharum and anisohydric Quercus rubra. We found a strong isohydric response in A. saccharum seedlings that included conservation of leaf water potentials (>-1.8 MPa) and reductions in non-structural carbohydrate concentrations consistent with reduction of stomatal conductance. Quercus rubra seedlings were able to survive to more negative water potentials, but only rarely, and they showed a similar reduction in photosynthetic capacity as was found for A. saccharum. Our results suggest that, although Q. rubra seedlings display some anisohydric responses to drought, they are more isohydric than adults. Both species seem to be relatively similar in their vulnerability to drought despite the differences predicted from adult drought response, and our results suggest that seedlings of both species will be similarly vulnerable to future drought events.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.6%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
8
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
9
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
14
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
20
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%