A new approach to integrate phylogenetic structure and partner availability to study biotic specialization in ecological networks
Pardo-De la Hoz, C. J.; Medeiros, I. D.; Gibert, J. P.; Chagnon, P.-L.; Magain, N.
Show abstract
Biotic specialization holds information about the assembly, evolution and stability of biological communities. Phylogenetic diversity metrics have been used to quantify biotic specialization, but their current implementations do not adequately account for the availability of the interacting partners. Also, the overdispersed pattern of phylogenetic specialization has been misinterpreted as an attribute of generalists. We developed an approach that resolves these issues by accounting for partner availability to quantify the phylogenetic structure of specialization (i.e., clustered, overdispersed, or random) in ecological networks. We showed that our approach avoids biases of previous methods. We also implemented it on empirical networks of host-parasite, avian seed-dispersal, lichenized fungi- cyanobacteria and coral-dinoflagellate interactions. We found a large proportion of taxa that interact with phylogenetically random partners, in some cases to a larger extent than detected with an existing method that does not account for partner availability. We also found many taxa that interact with phylogenetically clustered partners, while taxa with overdispersed partners were rare. Our results highlight the important role of randomness in shaping interaction networks, even in highly intimate symbioses, and provide a much-needed quantitative framework to assess the role that evolutionary history and symbiotic specialization play in shaping patterns of biodiversity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Telling mutualistic and antagonistic ecological networks apart by learning their multiscale structure 96%
- Including intraspecific trait variability to avoid distortion of functional diversity and ecological inference: lessons from natural assemblages 94%
- Partitioning the temporal changes in abundance-based beta diversity into loss and gain components 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Empirical abundance distributions are more uneven than expected given their statistical baseline 95%
- A probabilistic view of forbidden links: their prevalence and their consequences for the robustness of plant-hummingbird communities 95%
- Time is of the essence: A general framework for uncovering temporal structures of communities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.