Back

A comparison of data integration methods for single-cell RNA sequencing of cancer samples

Richards, L. M.; Riverin, M.; Mohanraj, S.; Ayyadhury, S.; Croucher, D. C.; Diaz-Mejia, J. J.; Coutinho, F. J.; Dirks, P. B.; Pugh, T. J.

2021-08-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.08.04.453579 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tumours are routinely profiled with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to characterize their diverse cellular ecosystems of malignant, immune, and stromal cell types. When combining data from multiple samples or studies, batch-specific technical variation can confound biological signals. However, scRNA-seq batch integration methods are often not designed for, or benchmarked, on datasets containing cancer cells. Here, we compare 5 data integration tools applied to 171,206 cells from 5 tumour scRNA-seq datasets. Based on our results, STACAS and fastMNN are the most suitable methods for integrating tumour datasets, demonstrating robust batch effect correction while preserving relevant biological variability in the malignant compartment. This comparison provides a framework for evaluating how well single-cell integration methods correct for technical variability while preserving biological heterogeneity of malignant and non-malignant cell populations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.