Back

Better together - Relative retention time plus spectral matching improves automated glycan characterization using PGC-nLC-IT-ESI-MS/MS

Alagesan, K.; Schirmeister, F.; Moeginger, U.; Everest-Dass, A.; Altmann, F.; Seeberger, P. H.; von Itzstein, M.; Packer, N. H.; Kolarich, D.

2021-08-04 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.08.04.451140 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Porous Graphitized Carbon nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (PGC-nLC-MS/MS) is a glycomics technique with the unique capacity to differentiate isobaric glycans. The lack of suitable software tools integrating chromatography and MS-information delivered by PGC-nLC-MS/MS has been limiting fast and robust glycan identification and quantitation. We report a LC-system-independent strategy called GlycoRRT that combines relative retention time (RRT) and negative ion fragment spectra analyses for isobaric structure-specific glycomics of PGC-nLC-MS/MS data. The GlycoRRT toolset is fully customizable and easily adaptable enabling semi-automated high-throughput structural assignments. The current library contains over 200 entries and their individual meta-data (MS instrumentation, experimental conditions, retention times, fragmentation profiles and glycan structural diagnostic ion features) relevant for reliable data analyses. The GlycoRRT workflow was employed to map the N- and O-glycome in blood group matched human plasma and urine as well as decipher Immunoglobulin (IgG) glycosylation features from 13 different animal species. We have also developed visualization tools to enable a consistent, reliable, and reproducible analysis of large sets of multidimensional PGC-nLC-MS/MS glycomics data. This comprehensive glycan resource provides the glycan map of human and animal species, will serve as a reference in dissecting the role of glycans in host pathogen interaction and zoonotic disease transmission.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.