Back

De novo evolution of macroscopic multicellularity

Bozdag, G. O.; Zamani-Dahaj, S. A.; Kahn, P. C.; Day, T. C.; Tong, K.; Balwani, A. H.; Dyer, E. L.; Yunker, P. J.; Ratcliff, W. C.

2021-08-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.08.03.454982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While early multicellular lineages necessarily started out as relatively simple groups of cells, little is known about how they became Darwinian entities capable of open-ended multicellular adaptation1,2. To explore this, we initiated the Multicellularity Long Term Evolution Experiment (MuLTEE), selecting for larger group size in the snowflake yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) model system. Given the historical importance of oxygen limitation3, our ongoing experiment consists of three metabolic treatments4: anaerobic, obligately aerobic, and mixotrophic yeast. After 600 rounds of selection, snowflake yeast in the anaerobic treatment evolved to be macroscopic, becoming ~2{middle dot}104 times larger (~mm scale) and ~104-fold more biophysically tough, while retaining a clonal multicellular life cycle. They accomplished this through sustained biophysical adaptation, evolving increasingly elongate cells that initially reduced the strain of cellular packing, then facilitated branch entanglements that enabled groups of cells to stay together even after many cellular bonds fracture. In contrast, snowflake yeast competing for low oxygen remained microscopic, evolving to be just ~6-fold larger, underscoring the critical role of oxygen levels in the evolution of multicellular size. Taken together, this work provides unique insight into an ongoing evolutionary transition in individuality, showing how simple groups of cells overcome fundamental biophysical limitations via gradual, yet sustained, multicellular adaptation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.