Back

Learning directed acyclic graphs for ligands and receptors based on spatially resolved transcriptomic analysis of ovarian cancer

CHOWDHURY, S.; Borgogno, S. F.; Yang, P.; Wang, W.; Peng, J.; Mok, S.; Wang, P.

2021-08-04 systems biology
10.1101/2021.08.03.454931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To unravel the mechanism of immune activation and suppression within tumors, a critical step is to identify transcriptional signals governing cell-cell communication between tumor and immune/stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Central to this communication are interactions between secreted ligands and cell-surface receptors, creating a highly connected signaling network among cells. Recent advancement in in situ-omics profiling, particularly spatial transcriptomic (ST) technology, provide unique opportunities to directly characterize ligand-receptor signaling networks that powers cell-cell communication. In this paper, we propose a novel statistical method, LRnetST, to characterize the ligand-receptor interaction networks between adjacent tumor and stroma cells based on ST data. LRnetST utilizes a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model with a novel treatment to handle the zero-inflated distribution observed in the ST data. It also leverages existing ligand-receptor regulation databases as prior information, and employs a bootstrap aggregation strategy to achieve robust network estimation. Application of LRnetST to ST data of high-grade serous ovarian tumor samples revealed both common and distinct ligand-receptor regulations across different tumors. Some of these interactions were validated through a MERFISH data set of independent ovarian tumor samples. These results cast light on biological processes relating to the communication between tumor and immune/stromal cells in ovarian tumors. An open-source R package of LRnetST is available on GitHub at https://github.com/jie108/LRnetST.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.