Automatic segmentation of the rat brain hippocampus in MRI after traumatic brain injury
De Feo, R.; Hamalainen, E.; Manninen, E.; Immonen, R.; Valverde, J. M.; Ndode-Ekane, X. E.; Grohn, O.; Pitkanen, A.; Tohka, J.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWRegistration-based methods are commonly used in the anatomical segmentation of magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. However, they are sensitive to the presence of deforming brain pathologies that may interfere with the alignment of the atlas image with the target image. Our goal was to develop an algorithm for automated segmentation of the normal and injured rat hippocampus. We implemented automated segmentation using a U-Net-like Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). of sham-operated experimental controls and rats with lateral-fluid-percussion induced traumatic brain injury (TBI) on MR images and trained ensembles of CNNs. Their performance was compared to three registration-based methods: single-atlas, multi-atlas based on majority voting and Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations (STEPS). Then, the automatic segmentations were quantitatively evaluated using six metrics: Dice score, Hausdorff distance, precision, recall, volume similarity and compactness using cross-validation. Our CNN and multi-atlas -based segmentations provided excellent results (Dice scores > 0.90) despite the presence of brain lesions, atrophy and ventricular enlargement. In contrast, the performance of singe-atlas registration was poor (Dice scores < 0.85). Unlike registration-based methods, which performed better in segmenting the contralateral than the ipsilateral hippocampus, our CNN-based method performed equally well bilaterally. Finally, we assessed the progression of hippocampal damage after TBI by applying our automated segmentation tool. Our data show that the presence of TBI, time after TBI, and whether the location of the hippocampus was ipsilateral or contralateral to the injury explained hippocampal volume (p = 0.029, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 97%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 95%
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms 96%
- A three-dimensional thalamocortical dataset for characterizing brain heterogeneity 96%
- CerebrA: Accurate registration and manual label correction of Mindboggle-101 atlas for MNI-ICBM152 template 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 97%
- Sex matters: the MouseX DW-ALLEN Atlas for mice diffusion-weighted MR imaging 97%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tractography-Pathology Correlations in Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study 92%
- Repetitive mild closed-head injury induced synapse loss and increased local BOLD-fMRI signal homogeneity 91%
- Cerebrovascular responses to O2-CO2 exchange ratio under brief breath-hold challenge in patients with chronic mild traumatic brain injury 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.