Auditory cortex activation is modulated nonlinearly by stimulation duration: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study
Zhang, Y. F.; Lasfargue, A.; Berry, I.
Show abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an increasingly popular method in hearing research. However, few studies have considered efficient stimulation parameters for fNIRS auditory experimental design. The objectives of our study are (1) to characterize the auditory hemodynamic responses to trains of white noise with increasing stimulation durations (8s, 10s, 15s, 20s) in terms of amplitude and response linearity; (2) to identify the most-efficient stimulation duration using fNIRS; and (3) to generalize results to more ecological environmental stimuli. We found that cortical activity is augmented following the increments in stimulation durations and reaches a plateau after about 15s of stimulation. The linearity analysis showed that this augmentation due to stimulation duration is not linear in the auditory cortex, the non-linearity being more pronounced for longer durations (15s and 20s). The 15s block duration that we propose as optimal precludes signal saturation, is associated with a high response amplitude and a relatively short total experimental duration. Moreover, the 15s duration remains optimal independently of the nature of presented sounds. The sum of these findings suggests that 15s stimulation duration used in the appropriate experimental setup allows researchers to acquire optimal fNIRS signal quality.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical auditory distance representation based on direct-to-reverberant energy ratio 95%
- Somatosensory cortical representations of assimilation effect by vibrotactile stimulation 95%
- A New Perspective on Individual Reliability beyond Group Effects for Event-related Potentials: A Multisensory Investigation and Computational Modeling 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.