Back

Multi-plasmid clash in a bacterial community: plasmid viability depends on the ecological setting of hosts

Given, C.; Penttinen, R.; Jalasvuori, M.

2021-08-02 microbiology
10.1101/2021.08.02.454727 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasmids are genetic elements that disperse horizontally between different strains and species of bacteria and a major factor in the dissemination of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance. Understanding the ecology of plasmids has a notable anthropocentric value and therefore the interactions between bacterial hosts and individual plasmids have been studied in detail. However, bacterial systems often carry multiple genetically distinct plasmids, but dynamics of these multiplasmid "clashes" has remained unstudied. Here, we set to investigate the survival of 11 mobilizable or conjugative plasmids in five different ecological settings. The key incentive was to determine whether plasmid dynamics are reproducible and whether there are trade-offs in plasmid fitness that stem from the ecological situation of their initial hosts. Growth rates and maximum population densities increased in all communities and treatments over the 42-day evolution experiment although plasmid contents at the end varied notably. We show that large multiresistance conferring plasmids are unfit when the community also contains smaller plasmids with fewer resistance genes. This suggests that restraining the use to few antibiotics can make bacterial communities sensitive to others. The hosts also appear to react to the presence of multiple genetically different plasmids by enhancing fimbriae production instead of alleviating costs of individual plasmids. In general, the survivors of the here-studied multi-plasmid clash are significantly affected by the presence or absence of antibiotic selection and plasmid-free hosts of varying fitness. Therefore, these trade-offs in different settings can explain for example why some resistance plasmids have an advantage during a rapid proliferation of antibiotic sensitive pathogen whereas others dominate in alternative situations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.7%
3
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
5
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
6
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
8
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
14
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
17
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
20
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
23
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
26
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%