Back

Surface Electromyography for Identification of Pre-Phonatory Activity

Kothare, H.; Courey, M. S.; Yung, K. C.; Schneider, S. L.; Nagarajan, S.; Houde, J.

2021-07-30 physiology
10.1101/2021.07.29.454386 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Surface electrode EMG is an established method for studying biomechanical activity. It has not been well studied in detecting laryngeal biomechanical activity of pre-phonatory onset. Our aims were to compare the sensitivity of surface EMG in identifying pre-phonatory laryngeal activity to needle electrode laryngeal EMG and to compare the pre-phonatory period in patients with adductor laryngeal dystonia (ADLD) with that in controls. ADLD patients (n = 10) undergoing needle LEMG prior to Botox(R) injection and participants with normal voices (n = 6) were recruited. Surface EMG electrodes were placed over the cricoid ring and thyrohyoid membrane. Needle EMG electrodes were inserted into the thyroarytenoid muscle. EMG and auditory output samples were collected during phonation onset. Tracings were de-identified and evaluated. Measurements of time from onset in change of the amplitude and motor unit frequency on the interference pattern to onset of phonation were calculated by two blinded raters. 42 of 71 patient and 40 of 50 control tracings were available for analysis. Correlation for pre-phonatory time between electrode configuration was 0.70 for patients, 0.64 for controls and 0.79 for all the data combined. Interrater correlation was 0.97 for needle and 0.96 for surface electrodes. ADLD patients had a longer pre-phonatory time than control subjects by 169.48ms with surface electrode and 140.23ms with needle electrode (p < 0.001). Surface EMG demonstrates equal reliability as Needle EMG in detecting pre-phonatory activity in controls and subjects. Patients with ADLD have a significantly prolonged pre-phonatory period when compared with controls.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
18.4%
2
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
7
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
8
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
9
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
15
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%