Back

Optimizing large organ scale micro computed tomography imaging in pig and human hearts using a novel air-drying technique

Pallares-Lupon, N.; Ramlugun, G. S.; Ozenne, V.; Duchateau, J.; Delgove, A.; Bayer, J. D.; Moreno, A.; Constantin, M.; Gerneke, D.; Sands, G. B.; Trew, M. L.; Hocini, M.; Haissaguerre, M.; Vigmond, E. J.; Quesson, B.; Bernus, O.; Walton, R. D.

2021-07-29 physiology
10.1101/2021.07.29.454121 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Underlying electrical propagation in the heart and potentially fatal arrhythmia is the cardiac microstructure. Despite the critical role of muscle architecture, a non-destructive approach to examine not only myocyte orientation, but cellular arrangement in to laminar organization is lacking in hearts from translational animal models and humans. X-ray micro computed tomography using contrast enhancing agents achieves three-dimensional images at near-histological resolutions. However, imaging large mammalian hearts presents challenges including X-ray over-attenuation and loss of image contrast. The goal of this study was to rethink tissue pre-treatment to optimize, and benefit from micro computed tomography imaging resolution in large tissues. Whole pig and human hearts were dehydrated and perfused with a tissue reinforcing agent, hexamethyldisilazane, and slowly air-dried. Heart morphology was conserved and temporally stable. This enabled direct air-mounting for micro computed tomography imaging. Moreover, the desiccated tissue density was significantly reduced compared to the initial hydrated state (P=0.04). Three-dimensional image reconstructions of air-dried hearts segmented using a single intensity threshold revealed detailed microstructural architecture of myolaminae. Conversely, one-step segmentation of hearts loaded with contrast agents poorly estimated the gross anatomical morphology of the heart and lacked identification of tissue microarchitecture. Air-drying large mammalian hearts optimizes X-ray imaging of cardiac microstructure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.