Back

Microbiome structure of a wild Drosophila community along tropical elevational gradients and comparison to laboratory lines

Brown, J. J.; Jandova, A.; Jeffs, C. T.; Higgie, M.; Novakova, E.; Lewis, O. T.; Hrcek, J.

2021-07-30 ecology
10.1101/2021.07.28.454263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Variation along environmental gradients in host-associated microbial communities is not well understood, compared to free-living microbial communities. Because elevational gradients may serve as natural proxies for climate change, understanding patterns along these gradients can inform our understanding of the threats hosts and their symbiotic microbes face in a warming world. In this study, we analysed bacterial microbiomes from pupae and adults of four Drosophila species native to Australian tropical rainforests. We sampled wild individuals at high and low elevation along two mountain gradients, to determine natural diversity patterns. Further, we sampled laboratory-reared individuals from isofemale lines established from the same localities, to see if any natural patterns are retained in the lab. In both environments, we controlled for diet to help elucidate other deterministic patterns of microbiome composition. We found small but significant differences in Drosophila bacterial community composition across elevation, with some notable taxonomic differences between different Drosophila species and sites. Further, we found that field-collected fly pupae had significantly richer microbiomes than laboratory-reared pupae. We also found similar microbiome composition in both types of provided diet, suggesting that the significant differences found among Drosophila microbiomes are the product of surrounding environments with different bacterial species pools, possibly bound to elevational differences in temperature. Our results suggest that comparative studies between lab and field specimens help reveal the true variability in microbiome communities that can exist within a single species. ImportanceBacteria form microbial communities inside most higher-level organisms, but we know little about how the microbiome varies along environmental gradients and between natural host populations and laboratory colonies. To explore such effects on insect-associated microbiomes, we studied gut microbiome in four Drosophila species over two mountain gradients in tropical Australia. We also compared these data to individuals kept in the laboratory to understand how different settings changed microbiome communities. We found that field sampled individuals had significantly higher microbiome diversity than those from the lab. In wild Drosophila populations, elevation explains a small but significant amount of the variation in their microbial communities. Our study highlights the importance of environmental bacterial sources for Drosophila microbiome composition across elevational gradients, and shows how comparative studies help reveal the true flexibility in microbiome communities that can exist within a species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.7%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.5%
3
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
10
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
21
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%