Predictive modelling of highly multiplexed tumour tissue images by graph neural networks
Martin-Gonzalez, P.; Crispin-Ortuzar, M.; Markowetz, F.
Show abstract
The progression and treatment response of cancer largely depends on the complex tissue structure that surrounds cancer cells in a tumour, known as the tumour microenvironment (TME). Recent technical advances have led to the development of highly multiplexed imaging techniques such as Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC), which capture the complexity of the TME by producing spatial tissue maps of dozens of proteins. Combining these multidimensional cell phenotypes with their spatial organization to predict clinically relevant information is a challenging computational task and so far no method has addressed it directly. Here, we propose and evaluate MULTIPLAI, a novel framework to predict clinical biomarkers from IMC data. The method relies on attention-based graph neural networks (GNNs) that integrate both the phenotypic and spatial dimensions of IMC images. In this proof-of- concept study we used MULTIPLAI to predict oestrogen receptor (ER) status, a key clinical variable for breast cancer patients. We trained different architectures of our framework on 240 samples and benchmarked against graph learning via graph kernels. Propagation Attribute graph kernels achieved a class-balanced accuracy of 66.18% in the development set (N=104) while GNNs achieved a class-balanced accuracy of 90.00% on the same set when using the best combination of graph convolution and pooling layers. We further validated this architecture in internal (N=112) and external test sets from different institutions (N=281 and N=350), demonstrating the generalizability of the method. Our results suggest that MULTIPLAI captures important TME features with clinical importance. This is the first application of GNNs to this type of data and opens up new opportunities for predictive modelling of highly multiplexed images.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Framework for Falsifiable Explanations of Machine Learning Models with an Application in Computational Pathology 95%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Expression Prediction from Histopathology Based on Cross-Modal Mask Reconstruction and Contrastive Learning 94%
- A Deep Graph Neural Network Architecture for Modelling Spatio-temporal Dynamics in resting-state functional MRI Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aggregation of Cohorts for Histopathological Diagnosis with Deep Morphological Analysis 95%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 95%
- ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A tool for federated training of segmentation models on whole slide images. 95%
- Improving generalization of deep learning models for diagnostic pathology by increasing variability in training data: experiments on osteosarcoma subtypes 93%
- Deep Learning Based Registration of Serial Whole-slide Histopathology Images in Different Stains 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 94%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 94%
- Biologically-informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post-treatment glioblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Transcriptomic Correlates of Histology using Deep Learning 96%
- MFmap: A semi-supervised generative model matching cell lines to tumours and cancer subtypes 94%
- Small hand-designed convolutional neural networks outperform transfer learning in automated cell shape detection in confluent tissues 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.