Individual repeatability, species differences, and the influence of socio-ecological factors on neophobia in 10 corvid species
Miller, R.; Lambert, M. L.; Frohnwieser, A.; Brecht, K. F.; Bugnyar, T.; Crampton, I.; Garcia-Pelegrin, E.; Gould, K.; Greggor, A. L.; Izawa, E.-I.; Kelly, D. M.; Li, Z.; Luo, Y.; Luong, L. B.; Massen, J. J. M.; Neider, A.; Reber, S. A.; Schiestl, M.; Seguchi, A.; Sepehri, P.; Stevens, J. R.; Taylor, A. H.; Wang, L.; Wolff, L. M.; Zhang, Y.; Clayton, N. S.
Show abstract
Behavioural responses to novelty, including fear and subsequent avoidance of novel stimuli, behaviours referred to as neophobia, determine how animals interact with their environment. Neophobia aids in navigating risk and impacts on adaptability and survival. There is variation within and between individuals and species, however, lack of large-scale, comparative studies critically limits investigation of the socio-ecological drivers of neophobia. In this study, we tested responses to novel objects and food (alongside familiar food) versus a baseline (familiar food alone) in 10 corvid species (241 subjects) across 10 labs worldwide. There were species differences in the latency to touch familiar food in the novel object and food conditions relative to the baseline. Three of seven socio-ecological factors influenced object neophobia: 1) use of urban habitat (vs not), 2) territorial pair vs family group sociality and 3) large vs small flock size (whereas range, caching, hunting live animals, and genus did not); while only flock size influenced food neophobia. We found that, overall, individuals were temporally and contextually repeatable (i.e. consistent) in their novelty responses in all conditions, indicating neophobia is a stable behavioural trait. With this study, we have established a network of corvid researchers, demonstrating potential for further collaboration to explore the evolution of cognition in corvids and other bird species. These novel findings enable us, for the first time in corvids, to identify the socio-ecological correlates of neophobia and grant insight into specific elements that drive higher neophobic responses in this avian family group.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wild raccoons are more innovative but not bolder than another ecological generalist, the Virginia opossum, on a pull-string task 96%
- Great tits show serial reversal learning in the perseverance phase but not in the new learning phase 95%
- Bold but not innovative in an urban exploiter, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fear of the new? Geckos hesitate to attack novel prey, feed near objects and enter a novel space 96%
- Equal performance but distinct behaviors: Astatotilapia burtoni sex differences in a novel object recognition task and spatial maze 94%
- Ecological Factors Affecting Prosociality in Marmoset Monkeys 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.