Back

Plasmid supercoiling decreases during the dark phase in cyanobacteria: a clarification of the interpretation of chloroquine-agarose gels.

Rüdiger, S.; Rediger, A.; Kölsch, A.; Dienst, D.; Axmann, I. M.; Machne, R.

2021-07-26 microbiology
10.1101/2021.07.26.453679 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In cyanobacteria DNA supercoiling varies over the diurnal light/dark cycle and is integrated with the circadian transcription program and (Woelfle et al. [2007], Vijayan et al. [2009], PNAS). Specifically, Woelfle et al. have reported that DNA supercoiling of an endogenous plasmid became progressively higher during prolonged dark phases in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. This is counterintuitive, since higher levels of negative DNA supercoiling are commonly associated with exponential growth and high metabolic flux. Vijayan et al. then have reverted the interpretation of plasmid mobility on agarose gels supplemented with chloroquine diphosphate (CQ), but not further discussed the differences. Here, we set out to clarify this open issue in cyanobacterial DNA supercoiling dynamics. We first re-capitulate Kellers band counting method (1975, PNAS) using CQ instead of ethidium bromide as the intercalating agent. A 500x-1000x higher CQ concentration is required in the DNA relaxation reaction (topoisomerase I) than in the agarose gel buffer to quench all negative supercoiling of pUC19 extracted from Escherichia coli. This is likely due to the dependence of both, the DNA binding affinity of CQ and the induced DNA unwinding angle, on the ionic strength of the buffer. Lower levels of CQ were required to fully relax in vivo pUC19 supercoiling than were used by Woelfle et al. Next, we analyzed the in vivo supercoiling of endogenous plasmids of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, at two different CQ concentrations. These experiments indicate that negative supercoiling of plasmids does not increase but decreases in the dark phase, and progressively decreases further in prolonged darkness.

Matching journals

The top 20 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.3%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
6
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
7
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Journal of Bacteriology
190 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
11
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
14
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Biology Direct
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
50% of probability mass above
21
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
24
FEMS Microbiology Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
29
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
30
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%