Multi-omics insights into the biological mechanisms underlying gene-by-lifestyle interactions with smoking and alcohol consumption detected by genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis
Majarian, T. D.; Bentley, A. R.; Laville, V.; Brown, M. R.; Chasman, D. I.; Cupples, L. A.; de Vries, P. S.; Feitosa, M. F.; Franceschini, N.; Gauderman, W. J.; Levy, D.; Morrison, A. C.; Province, M.; Rao, D. C.; Schwander, K.; Sung, Y. J.; Rotimi, C. N.; Aschard, H.; Gu, C. C.; Manning, A. K.; CHARGE Gene-Lifestyle Interactions Working Group,
Show abstract
Gene-lifestyle interaction analyses have identified genetic variants whose effect on cardiovascular risk-raising traits is modified by alcohol consumption and smoking behavior. The biological mechanisms of these interactions remain largely unknown, but may involve epigenetic modification linked to perturbation of gene expression. Diverse, individual-level datasets including genotypes, methylation and gene expression conditional on lifestyle factors, are ideally suited to study this hypothesis, yet are often unavailable for large numbers of individuals. Summary-level data, such as effect sizes of genetic variants on a phenotype, present an opportunity for multi-omic study of the biological mechanisms underlying gene-lifestyle interactions. We propose a method that unifies disparate, publicly available summary datasets to build mechanistic hypotheses in models of smoking behavior and alcohol consumption with blood lipid levels and blood pressure measures. Of 897 observed genetic interactions, discovered through genome-wide analysis in diverse multi-ethnic cohorts, 48 were identified with lifestyle-related differentially methylated sites within close proximity and linked to target genes. Smoking behavior and blood lipids account for 37 and 28 of these signals respectively. Five genes also showed differential expression conditional on lifestyle factors within these loci with mechanisms supported in the literature. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of summary data in characterizing observed gene-lifestyle interactions and prioritizes genetic loci for experimental follow up related to blood lipids, blood pressure, and cigarette smoking. We show concordance between multiple trait-or exposure-related associations from diverse assays, driving hypothesis generation for better understanding gene-lifestyle interactions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetic clocks predict prevalence and incidence of leading causes of death and disease burden 93%
- Pre-diagnosis blood DNA methylation profiling of twin pairs discordant for breast cancer points to the importance of environmental risk 93%
- The association of DNA methylation with body mass index: distinguishing between predictors and biomarkers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and offspring cord blood DNA methylation: a meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies 95%
- Methylome-Wide Association Study Of Central Adiposity Implicates Genes Involved In Immune And Endocrine Systems 93%
- Epigenome-wide association study of serum folate in maternal peripheral blood leukocytes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal smoking DNA methylation risk score associated with health outcomes in offspring of European and South Asian ancestry 96%
- Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts 95%
- Environment-wide and epigenome-wide association study of adiposity in "Children of 1997" birth cohort 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for epigenetic epidemiology: a comparison with DNA methylation microarrays 95%
- Genome-wide association study of body fat distribution traits in Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Study 95%
- Heritability and family-based GWAS analyses of the N-acyl ethanolamine and ceramide plasma lipidome 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.