Back

Structure insights, thermodynamic profiles, dsDNA melting activity, and liquid-liquid phase separation of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid N-terminal domain binding to DNA

Caruso, I. P.; Almeida, V. S.; Amaral, M. J.; Andrade, G. C.; Araujo, G. R.; Araujo, T. S.; Azevedo, J. M.; Barbosa, G. M.; Bartkevihi, L.; Bezerra, P. R.; Cabral, K. M. d. S.; Lourenco, I. O.; Malizia-Motta, C. L. F.; Marques, A. L.; Mebus-Antunes, N. C.; Neves-Martins, T. C.; de Sa, J. M.; Sanches, K.; Santana-Silva, M. C.; Vasconcelos, A. A.; Almeida, M. S.; Amorim, G. C.; Anobom, C. D.; Da Poian, A. T.; Gomes-Neto, F.; Pinheiro, A. S.; Almeida, F. C. L.

2021-07-22 biophysics
10.1101/2021.07.21.453232 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N) is a multifunctional promiscuous nucleic acid-binding protein, which plays a major role in nucleocapsid assembly and discontinuous RNA transcription, facilitating the template switch of transcriptional regulatory sequences (TRS). Here, we dissect the structural features of the N protein N-terminal domain (N-NTD), either with or without the SR-rich motif (SR), upon binding to single and double-stranded TRS DNA, as well as their activities for dsTRS melting and TRS-induced liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). Our study gives insights on specificity for N-NTD/N-NTD-SR interaction with TRS, including an unfavorable energetic contribution to binding along with hydrogen bonds between the triple-thymidine (TTT) motif in the dsTRS and {beta}-sheet II due to the defined position and orientation of the DNA duplex, a well-defined pattern ({Delta}H > 0 and {Delta}S > 0 for ssTRS, and {Delta}H < 0 and {Delta}S < 0 for dsTRS) for the thermodynamic profile of binding, and a preference for TRS in the formation of liquid condensates when compared to a non-specific sequence. Moreover, our results on DNA binding may serve as a starting point for the design of inhibitors, including aptamers, against N, a possible therapeutic target essential for the virus infectivity.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.